<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One way the iPad won&#8217;t change magazine design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dpwilliams.com/one-way-the-ipad-wont-change-magazine-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dpwilliams.com/one-way-the-ipad-wont-change-magazine-design/</link>
	<description>Some ideas about the future of publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:38:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dpwilliams</title>
		<link>http://www.dpwilliams.com/one-way-the-ipad-wont-change-magazine-design/comment-page-1/#comment-13101</link>
		<dc:creator>dpwilliams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dpwilliams.com/?p=586#comment-13101</guid>
		<description>I agree with you completely that blogs should always be ad hoc, that’s what is so great about them! The issue I have is that a platform for instantaneously updated content already exists in blogs and other websites.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don’t want a digital magazine to be a website with a cover price. There would be no value in that for the audience or the content provider because it doesn’t offer anything unique or appropriate for the medium.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If alterations need to be made to the magazine; updating it based on audience interaction, I don’t have a problem with that at all, indeed it would be essential that happens. The updates and alterations shouldn’t be new features though that would be in the next edition of the magazine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The same brand can deliver content in different ways on different platforms, a digital magazine is just one of them. I’m writing a piece about that at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you completely that blogs should always be ad hoc, that’s what is so great about them! The issue I have is that a platform for instantaneously updated content already exists in blogs and other websites.</p>
<p>I don’t want a digital magazine to be a website with a cover price. There would be no value in that for the audience or the content provider because it doesn’t offer anything unique or appropriate for the medium.</p>
<p>If alterations need to be made to the magazine; updating it based on audience interaction, I don’t have a problem with that at all, indeed it would be essential that happens. The updates and alterations shouldn’t be new features though that would be in the next edition of the magazine.</p>
<p>The same brand can deliver content in different ways on different platforms, a digital magazine is just one of them. I’m writing a piece about that at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Keevil</title>
		<link>http://www.dpwilliams.com/one-way-the-ipad-wont-change-magazine-design/comment-page-1/#comment-13100</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Keevil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dpwilliams.com/?p=586#comment-13100</guid>
		<description>Belts and Braces; note not sitting on the fence, more leaning against it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree with Luke on the importance in a digital platform of Instantaneous updates, whether they be blogs, podcasts and or publications.&lt;br&gt;Indeed amendments, retractions and other alternications (i may have made that word up) can and should occur instantaneously. With thee caveat that they should be noted as such.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Signor Williams you are correct also, some publications should maintain a level of frequency and that many blogs, podcasts etc would and are improved by some degree of system, deadline and expectation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This would also help to differentiate them from personal blogs (repeat) which are and should always be ad hoc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belts and Braces; note not sitting on the fence, more leaning against it.</p>
<p>I agree with Luke on the importance in a digital platform of Instantaneous updates, whether they be blogs, podcasts and or publications.<br />Indeed amendments, retractions and other alternications (i may have made that word up) can and should occur instantaneously. With thee caveat that they should be noted as such.</p>
<p>Signor Williams you are correct also, some publications should maintain a level of frequency and that many blogs, podcasts etc would and are improved by some degree of system, deadline and expectation.</p>
<p>This would also help to differentiate them from personal blogs (repeat) which are and should always be ad hoc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
